If you’re looking for a simple investment strategy, so-called “lazy portfolios” may be an appealing option. These consist of just a few widely-diversified mutual funds or exchange-traded funds. Here’s an overview of some common lazy portfolios.
One-fund portfolios (target date funds)
The laziest of lazy portfolios only contain a single mutual fund or ETF: a target date fund. These funds contain a diversified mix of stocks and bonds that automatically changes over time.
Many mutual fund custodians, such as Vanguard and Fidelity, offer target date mutual funds that are widely available in 401(k) plans, IRAs and other tax-advantaged accounts. If you’re investing through a brokerage account that doesn’t offer mutual funds, there are also target date ETFs available, such as the iShares LifePath series.
Typically, target date fund issuers offer a variety of funds that are labeled with target retirement years, often spaced out in five-year increments. For example, the iShares LifePath Target Date 2070 ETF (ITDJ) is intended for young workers who intend to retire around 2070. The LifePath Target Date 2045 ETF (ITDE) is for mid-career workers who want to retire around 2045, and the LifePath Target Date 2030 ETF (ITDB) is for workers on the cusp of retirement.
These funds tend to invest heavily in stocks (with a small bond allocation) when they are decades away from their target date in order to maximize growth, and automatically become more conservative (mostly bonds with a small stock allocation) as that target date approaches. If you’re investing for a non-retirement goal, such as future college expenses for a newborn, you could choose a fund with a target “retirement year” that corresponds to the child’s 18th birthday.
According to Morningstar, the average expense ratio of target date funds reached a new low of 0.29% in 2024. That’s not bad, but the fees can be even lower if you build a two- or three-fund portfolio of index funds and manage them yourself.
Two-fund portfolios
A two-fund portfolio consists of a diversified stock market index fund and a diversified bond market index fund.
These could be global index funds, such as the Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and the Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND), or they could be U.S.-focused index funds such as an S&P 500 ETF and a short-term U.S. Treasury ETF.
Initially, a two-fund portfolio should consist mostly of the stock fund — say, 80% stock fund, 20% bond fund — but over time, it should gradually shift toward bonds as you near retirement (or whatever your financial goal is).
Opinions vary about the right “ending allocation” of a two-fund portfolio; 80% bonds and 20% stocks or 60% bonds and 40% stocks are both possible answers. It depends on what level of risk you’re willing to tolerate at the end of your investment journey.
Brokerage firms | |
|---|---|
Three-fund portfolios
Many two-fund portfolios just consist of a U.S. stock index fund and a U.S. bond index fund. That’s enough for many investors, but it runs the risk of missing out on international stock returns. In the last year, for example, many international stock indexes have outperformed U.S. stock indexes.
The three-fund portfolio solves this problem by supplementing the two-fund portfolio with an international stock fund, typically a global “ex-U.S.” fund that invests in non-U.S. stocks, such as the iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS).
How much of the three-fund portfolio should be in the U.S. stock fund, and how much should be in the ex-U.S. stock fund? That’s up to you. The U.S. stock market makes up about 70% of the global stock market capitalization, so one potential rule of thumb is to follow that ratio. A three-fund portfolio built on that principle might initially consist of a 55% allocation to an S&P 500 ETF, a 25% allocation to an ex-U.S. ETF, and a 20% allocation to a bond ETF.
Much like the two-fund portfolio, the three-fund portfolio should get more conservative as it approaches maturity, which means gradually trimming the U.S. and international stock fund allocations and increasing the bond fund allocation, until it’s mostly bonds.
How to maintain a lazy portfolio
Lazy portfolios are designed to help you meet your goals with minimal thought and minimal effort — but “minimal” doesn’t mean “zero.”
How do you add money to a lazy portfolio? One popular approach is dollar-cost averaging: adding money on a regular basis, such as every paycheck or every month, and investing it proportionally in your mix of funds. This keeps your cost basis close to the long-term average price of the funds, while investing a lump sum potentially means buying in at a high.
We’ve also discussed how lazy portfolios should become more conservative over time. If you’re using a two-fund or three-fund portfolio, how often should you change the allocation, and by how much?
When it comes to frequency, studies suggest that annual rebalancing is ideal. A 2022 study by Vanguard found that more frequent rebalancing can drive up transaction costs (via mutual fund sales loads and capital gains taxes, where applicable), while less frequent rebalancing may allow the investment allocations to drift far from their target mix.
How much should you change the mix each year? One approach is to look, for each fund, at your initial allocation and your intended ending allocation. Subtract the initial value from the end value, and divide that by the number of years in your time horizon, to get the ideal annual change.
For example, suppose you have a two-fund portfolio that consists of an 80% allocation to a stock ETF and a 20% allocation to a bond ETF. Suppose you intend to retire in 40 years, at which time you want to have a 60% bond allocation and a 40% stock allocation.
That means you want the stock allocation to decrease by 40 percentage points over 40 years, and the bond allocation to increase by 40 percentage points over 40 years. So it would make sense to trim one percentage point off the stock ETF allocation, and add one percentage point to the bond ETF allocation, when you rebalance each year.
» MORE: Best brokers for ETF investing
Neither the author nor editor owned positions in the aforementioned investments at the time of publication.
Explore more on
Article sources
NerdWallet writers are subject matter authorities who use primary, trustworthy sources to inform their work, including peer-reviewed studies, government websites, academic research and interviews with industry experts. All content is fact-checked for accuracy, timeliness and relevance. You can learn more about NerdWallet's high standards for journalism by reading our editorial guidelines.
- 1.Morningstar. Target Date Funds Have Delivered. Accessed Jul 2, 2025.
- 2.Vanguard. Rational rebalancing: An analytical approach to multiasset portfolio rebalancing decisions and insights. Accessed Jul 2, 2025.
