We believe everyone should be able to make financial decisions with
confidence. While we don't cover every company or financial product on
the market, we work hard to share a wide range of offers and objective
editorial perspectives.
So how do we make money? Our partners compensate us for advertisements that
appear on our site. This compensation helps us provide tools and services -
like free credit score access and monitoring. With the exception of
mortgage, home equity and other home-lending products or services, partner
compensation is one of several factors that may affect which products we
highlight and where they appear on our site. Other factors include your
credit profile, product availability and proprietary website methodologies.
However, these factors do not influence our editors' opinions or ratings, which are based on independent research and analysis. Our partners cannot
pay us to guarantee favorable reviews. Here is a list of our partners.
Jury Rules Live Nation Is an Illegal Monopoly — What It Means For You
The Live Nation ruling could reshape ticket prices and competition.
Anna Helhoski is a senior writer covering economic news and trends in consumer finance at NerdWallet. She is an on-air contributor and producer of Money News segments for NerdWallet's Smart Money podcast. She is also an authority on student loans. She joined NerdWallet in 2014. Her work has been syndicated in news outlets nationwide including The Associated Press, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times and USA Today. She previously covered local news in the New York metro area for the Daily Voice and New York state politics for The Legislative Gazette. She holds a bachelor's degree in journalism from Purchase College, State University of New York.
Rick VanderKnyff leads the news team at NerdWallet. Previously, he has worked as a channel manager at MSN.com, as a web manager at University of California San Diego, and as a copy editor and staff writer at the Los Angeles Times. He holds a Bachelor of Arts in communications and a Master of Arts in anthropology.
Published
How is this page expert verified?
NerdWallet's content is fact-checked for accuracy, timeliness and
relevance. It undergoes a thorough review process involving
writers and editors to ensure the information is as clear and
complete as possible.
This page includes information about these cards, currently unavailable on
NerdWallet. The information has been collected by NerdWallet and has not
been provided or reviewed by the card issuer.
Sweeping changes may be coming for concertgoers after a federal jury in New York on Wednesday ruled that Live Nation Entertainment illegally monopolized the live event market.
What comes next is uncertain: Will the entertainment giant be broken up? How much will Live Nation owe in monetary damages? Will consumers see compensation? Those decisions lie with the U.S. District Court Judge Arun Subramanian who will determine what remedies Live Nation must implement. It’s highly likely that Live Nation will appeal. Live Nation did not respond to requests for comment and has yet to issue a public statement.
Live Nation Entertainment, created by the 2010 merger of Live Nation and Ticketmaster, is the dominant force in the live music industry. Its reach extends across concert promotion, ticketing and venue ownership.
Throughout the trial, Live Nation cast itself as a “fierce competitor” in the concert and events marketplace — not a monopoly. After six weeks of testimony and four days of deliberation, the jury flatly disagreed.
The road to the Live Nation ruling
If you’re a concertgoer, you’re likely familiar with the frustration of paying high fees on top of already-pricey tickets or facing steep resale markups.
For years, antitrust watchdogs and states have argued that Live Nation holds a monopolistic grip on the industry, wielding its extensive leverage over artists, venues and independent promoters. And consumers have ultimately footed the bill.
Meet MoneyNerd, your weekly news decoder
So much news. So little time. NerdWallet's new weekly newsletter makes sense of the headlines that affect your wallet.
Multiple lawsuits have been filed against Live Nation amid long-standing allegations that the company has exerted an outsized influence on live entertainment. Public backlash hit a fever pitch in 2022 when Ticketmaster crashed under the demand for Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour and shut out millions of fans.
Early on in the trial, the Department of Justice reached a tentative $280 million settlement in the case, which included no admission of wrongdoing. It provided some concessions, including a 15% ticketing fee cap. For context, Live Nation earned $25.2 billion in revenue last year — $280 million is what Live Nation earns in four days of revenue, according to Stephen Parker, executive director of the National Independent Venue Association (NIVA).
However, only seven states accepted the settlement as the rest decided to continue the case without the Justice Department, leading to the latest ruling on April 15.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta called the verdict a “historic and resounding victory for artists, fans and the venues that support them” in a statement following the verdict. “In the face of dwindling antitrust enforcement by the Trump administration, this verdict shows just how far states can go to protect our residents from big corporations that are using their power to illegally raise prices and rip-off Americans,” Bonta said.
» Stay informed:
Check out NerdWallet's news hub for all the latest.
Judge Subramanian will determine remedies in separate proceedings, including setting an overall damages amount.
In the initial filing, the Department of Justice originally sought to divest Ticketmaster from Live Nation, but the DOJ has settled its case without pursuing that end. The judge still has the authority to break up the company under the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, but it’s unclear whether he will do so.
Here are some other lingering questions:
Will consumers be compensated? The jury determined that Ticketmaster had overcharged consumers by $1.72 per ticket. It’s not clear if concertgoers will receive compensation.
Will fees go down? Regulators could force changes to fees, including the types of fees or limits on total charges.
Will ticket prices get cheaper? That remains unclear. If Live Nation is no longer the only game in town, then increased competition could eventually give consumers more choice, which in turn could put downward pressure on prices.
There are other possibilities that could shape how much you pay for live shows. Venues could have more freedom in choosing ticketing platforms, while artists may have greater flexibility in choosing where they perform — both are shifts that could influence pricing down the road.
Whatever changes may come won’t happen overnight.
What about that other lawsuit?
There is also another separate suit that was filed in September 2025: The FTC and seven states sued Live Nation Entertainment, accusing Ticketmaster of “tacitly coordinating with brokers and allowing them to harvest millions of dollars worth of tickets in the primary market,” according to a statement from the FTC.
That case is still working its way through the courts and could result in fines, restitution or other changes to how the live events ticketing market works.
NerdWallet's free weekly newsletter, MoneyNerd, will follow this developing story.
(Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images News via Getty Images)